1/2 spin Buddhas and vibing bowls
So another connection here is this. Gentle Tin is in the bronzes used in the ancient meditative god statues both east and west.
The day after the trip to the city museum, and with apparent great synchronicity,my curious friend Bob, who, in one of his forms, is a collector of Oriental stone and metal statuary, gives me an antique Tibetan buddha as a gift. It has a silver plated bronze base and robe. The shape is vaguely triangular pyramidal front to back rising from a copper plate base floor, though ovoid silver plated bronze lotus base walls through silver/ pale bronze body to dark bronze hair and crown chakra with a bronze point at the crown chackra .
The inside is hollow and heavily patined - clearly old bronze. So I've ordered temple monk chant cd's to work that amazing vibe, hopefully rattle up an old, purblind pineal crystal or two inside my resonating skull and sync in to this.... Finding correct resonant vibration is absolutely necessary and follows, i think, the Wallace analysis of the secondary accelerations for ag, he sees some of the process as a secondary "kinemassic" effect, approached analagouly to EM induction. From chants I've listened to , esp in the movie Kundun, monks always seem to start w/ the low shuman stuff from cd chants and amp higher off. Since I randomly found that Tibetan shop in Raleigh North Carolina, I've aquired four antique tibetan singing bowls.
The old bowls are said to be composed of a 3 to 12 metal alloy including mercury. Rotating and accelerating liquid mercury is the basis for the toroidal device in Wallace's second ag patent. I wil follow this with analysis of mercury,antimony, nickel and zinc.
http://www.frankperry.co.uk/Singing%20Bowls.htm
Some sources state that the bowls are made from the seven sacred metals, corresponding to the sacred seven planets: gold (Sun), silver (moon), mercury (Mercury), copper (Venus), iron (Mars), tin (Jupiter), antimony (Saturn), yet others that a selection (of anything from 3 to 9 - depending upon whom is being asked) from a total of nine metals was used (the seven listed above plus nickel and zinc) and yet another comprising twelve metals. Legend goes on to say that the iron was sometimes replaced by meteorite found on Himalayan mountaintops, metal from the heavens, or that meteorite was added also.
http://www.sacredsingingbowls.com/aboutbowls.cfm
Singing Bowls
Ritual Items
Himalayan Artifacts & Relics
The Tibetan singing bowl has been shrouded in myth and mystery throughout the ages and even during recent times. Even the name Tibetan singing bowl is a misnomer that has continued even to this day. Antique singing bowls were not only made in Tibet, but throughout the Himalayan region. According to renown singing bowl expert Dr. Mitch Nur, Ph.D, (www.sacredsound.org) most old singing bowls originated in Nepal and India, although antique bowls have been known to have been made from as far as Afghanistan to Burma. Another misnomer is that they were made from the sacred "seven metal alloy,". As far as can be known there has been no definitive proof that this was in truth the fact. The most plausible belief is that they were made of between 3 to 12 metal alloys, and that the metal alchemist used what ever metals were available in the particular region. Even more astonishing is the myth that singing bowls are Buddhist in origin. Many experts, including Dr. Nur, believe that singing bowls most likely originated in northeast and eastern Tibet, where fire cults existed among the Ch'iang tribes of Northeastern Tibet and the Naxi in eastern Tibet. These cultures had extensive knowledge and experience in metallurgy and the practice of shamanic rituals and techniques. It's most likely that singing bowls were used in shamanic rituals, for healing, shamanic journeying, storytelling, exorcism and maybe even the use of sound as an anti-gravity tool. These shamanic alchemists, were of the Bon animistic religion, which emphasized sacred sound in their spiritual practices. After Buddhism replaced the Bon as the main religion in Tibet in 12 century A.D., the singing bowl has been associated with Buddhism. The use of the singing bowl in Buddhist ritual practices has been held in upmost secrecy. It has been rumored that only the highest Lamas use and have knowledge about their specific uses in certain Buddhist rituals and practices. What we do know is that these marvelous instruments with their harmonious vibrations have the ability to take us out of ourselves, our ego, and bring peace and harmony to our body, mind and spirit. They have the ability to put us into alpha or theta brainwave states that allow us to access a quiet, peaceful state of mind, which oncologist Dr. Mitchell Gaynor believes has a powerful healing effect on our bodies, mind and spirit.
best regards,
ab
what we are after in the analogies is CU/human aura LC
Sunday, October 3, 2010
पथ्वोर्किंग लिनेअगेस
How many lineages can one pathwork? His gurus spend their lives mastering one lineage, but R pathworks A MULTITUDE of lineages - so there seems to be a fundamental contradiction and disconnect in true knowledge pathworking. R reminds me of what Master Po called the young Kwai Chang Caine in the old Kung Fu television series: grasshopper. R jumps from lineage to lineage as a grasshopper jumps from grass blade to grass blade. Now if the grasshopper would just chew one blade down - he would discover that the juiciest and sweetest part is gotten after a long labor.... kung fu means something like "when movement meets with devotion" and in Chinese wisdom, when such is the case, it is known that a great natural law is realized.
best regards,
ab
best regards,
ab
--- In c_s_s_p@yahoogroups.com, Lee V wrote:
>
> Oh Gosh, here we go big time. Ok, please bear with me here Andrew as I appreciate the dialogue.
>
> Granted, complex manifold theory is used to define spacetime topologies. That's not exactly the same as saying that 1/0 is THE definition of the unified field. Now is it?
> Also, I'm glad that Einstein found the physical application for the tensor, but again, that's not exactly the same as saying what I stated above. And as far as some "genius" finding a physical explanation for everything from pure mathematics, with all due respect that so-called genius may be in your midst.
You must pardon me, Lee, but as Oscar Wilde said, I am not young enough to know everything.
But certainly retain enough curiosity to wonder how 1/0, "one thing divided by nothing," combines magnetism,electricity, gravity, strong force, weak force, AND, I'm sure you 'll agree, that strangest energy of all -- the moebius vortex of consciousness --- all as parallel forms of one energy.
But no one can argue about sources of inspiration in the creation of your device. Tesla saw something in the sun in a waking dream that inspired him to conceive the rotating magnetic field. Kekule dreamed of snakes biting their tails and conceived the benzene ring...Obiously, the "inherent geometry of that number" inspires you, and that's a good thing.
> Using ideas from algebraic geometry to write computer algorithms does not come close to creating a free energy machine based on the inherent geometry of that number which is said to be undefined.
>
> Mankinds role in the universe is not a philosophical question it is part of the theory of everything and part of the geometry of the unified field itself. Now I could tell you what mankinds role is, but you should know it has something to do with appreciating the absolute greatest value and realizing that the unified field is one thing divided by nothing.
Yes, insofar as a unified field theory must include consciousness, the "knowing" field, say,
it would include mankind as a physical and metaphysical entity. As according to Nicolas of Cusa,
"finite beings are contractions of the universe: each contracts and is 'mirrored' in every other thing. The universe is therefore a harmony of plurality in unity, a manifestation of God in whom the opposites are reconciled. Man as a microcosm mirrors the macrocosm" I completely agree with this (alchemical) formulation.
http://www.philosophos.com/philosophical_connections/profile_052.html
But you present a valid anthropomorphic argument that the universe exists because we are here to appreciate it. And this is another deeply philosophical question.
> Your assumption that the attributes you think I gave 1/0 helped me answer the questions is just that, your assumption. The truth is is that 1/0 spoke to me all that which is hidden. The truth comes from that number and what it means, not from me. All you have to do is evaluate the number using limits to see that it represents the coincidence of opposites, then you will have to understand what that means to see farther than man has seen. Or you could read the work of Nicolas of Cusa who figured the same thing out only he used a slightly different framework not based in mathematics as I have done.
>
> Riemann sphere is different than the yin yang symbol because the Riemann sphere itself does not represent the coincidence of opposites.
The Riemann sphere doesn't represent the coincidence of opposites, only the point on the sphere with the infinite coordinate represents pos and neg infinity as the object wraps around in a sphere. In the planar projections of the sphere the separate infinities reappear, but I could be wrong about that....
best regards,
ab
>Look at the wikipedia page for Riemann sphere and it says 1/0 equals infinity. That is just plain wrong! Any mathematicians knows that 1/0 is equal to both positive and negative infinity. If it was just equal to one infinity they would have defined it. The reason they haven't defined it is because it does represent a coincidence of opposites and the mathematicians can't wrap their heads around that yet. If they did, they would see that it implies that the laws of thermodynamics are incomplete and it would shatter their world view. Hopefully you see how important this is. Now as far as positive and negative infinity being combined in the same symbol, you are exactly correct. THAT is the coincidence of opposites my friend.
>
> The riemann sphere does not represent the point of the coincidence of opposites. It does not include negative infinity which is a big big mistake that renders the whole thing virtually useless. Even if it did, it's like the difference between the number circle and the symbol of truth. The symbol of truth is a direct relationship to the workings of nature, whereas the number circle is just a graph pretty much.
>
> regards, Lee
>
> Oh Gosh, here we go big time. Ok, please bear with me here Andrew as I appreciate the dialogue.
>
> Granted, complex manifold theory is used to define spacetime topologies. That's not exactly the same as saying that 1/0 is THE definition of the unified field. Now is it?
> Also, I'm glad that Einstein found the physical application for the tensor, but again, that's not exactly the same as saying what I stated above. And as far as some "genius" finding a physical explanation for everything from pure mathematics, with all due respect that so-called genius may be in your midst.
You must pardon me, Lee, but as Oscar Wilde said, I am not young enough to know everything.
But certainly retain enough curiosity to wonder how 1/0, "one thing divided by nothing," combines magnetism,electricity, gravity, strong force, weak force, AND, I'm sure you 'll agree, that strangest energy of all -- the moebius vortex of consciousness --- all as parallel forms of one energy.
But no one can argue about sources of inspiration in the creation of your device. Tesla saw something in the sun in a waking dream that inspired him to conceive the rotating magnetic field. Kekule dreamed of snakes biting their tails and conceived the benzene ring...Obiously, the "inherent geometry of that number" inspires you, and that's a good thing.
> Using ideas from algebraic geometry to write computer algorithms does not come close to creating a free energy machine based on the inherent geometry of that number which is said to be undefined.
>
> Mankinds role in the universe is not a philosophical question it is part of the theory of everything and part of the geometry of the unified field itself. Now I could tell you what mankinds role is, but you should know it has something to do with appreciating the absolute greatest value and realizing that the unified field is one thing divided by nothing.
Yes, insofar as a unified field theory must include consciousness, the "knowing" field, say,
it would include mankind as a physical and metaphysical entity. As according to Nicolas of Cusa,
"finite beings are contractions of the universe: each contracts and is 'mirrored' in every other thing. The universe is therefore a harmony of plurality in unity, a manifestation of God in whom the opposites are reconciled. Man as a microcosm mirrors the macrocosm" I completely agree with this (alchemical) formulation.
http://www.philosophos.com/philosophical_connections/profile_052.html
But you present a valid anthropomorphic argument that the universe exists because we are here to appreciate it. And this is another deeply philosophical question.
> Your assumption that the attributes you think I gave 1/0 helped me answer the questions is just that, your assumption. The truth is is that 1/0 spoke to me all that which is hidden. The truth comes from that number and what it means, not from me. All you have to do is evaluate the number using limits to see that it represents the coincidence of opposites, then you will have to understand what that means to see farther than man has seen. Or you could read the work of Nicolas of Cusa who figured the same thing out only he used a slightly different framework not based in mathematics as I have done.
>
> Riemann sphere is different than the yin yang symbol because the Riemann sphere itself does not represent the coincidence of opposites.
The Riemann sphere doesn't represent the coincidence of opposites, only the point on the sphere with the infinite coordinate represents pos and neg infinity as the object wraps around in a sphere. In the planar projections of the sphere the separate infinities reappear, but I could be wrong about that....
best regards,
ab
>Look at the wikipedia page for Riemann sphere and it says 1/0 equals infinity. That is just plain wrong! Any mathematicians knows that 1/0 is equal to both positive and negative infinity. If it was just equal to one infinity they would have defined it. The reason they haven't defined it is because it does represent a coincidence of opposites and the mathematicians can't wrap their heads around that yet. If they did, they would see that it implies that the laws of thermodynamics are incomplete and it would shatter their world view. Hopefully you see how important this is. Now as far as positive and negative infinity being combined in the same symbol, you are exactly correct. THAT is the coincidence of opposites my friend.
>
> The riemann sphere does not represent the point of the coincidence of opposites. It does not include negative infinity which is a big big mistake that renders the whole thing virtually useless. Even if it did, it's like the difference between the number circle and the symbol of truth. The symbol of truth is a direct relationship to the workings of nature, whereas the number circle is just a graph pretty much.
>
> regards, Lee
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
